Thanks Ken.
Typo there - “rugs” should have said “rigs”!
We have done some preliminary work on dual rigs, but we have not been able to prioritize it above other things occupying our time. It is still on the to do list though so we haven’t made any different decisions in this regard.
I think he meant the whole idea has been swept under the rug. 
Not quite… It is just to be interpreted as “not actively under development”, but like anything else, we like to keep our ear to the ground and do our best to understand which features and requests would benefit the largest number of folks. We don’t always do this… sometimes we have other reasoning, but this is our standard position. Right now… our understanding of this feature is that the barrier to entry is pretty high in order to be able to make use of this stuff. That barrier is usually cost, but is also complexity sometimes. This means that there is typically only a small-ish subset of users for this feature. Coupled with very limited development resources it becomes less likely to attain priority for release. We are totally fine being wrong and we do realize that equipment costs are not as high as they once were, but with so many things on the list that are useful to everyone all the time…