Start/End mount position offset

Had an interesting session last night. PhD2’s SNR was all over the place but there were no disconnects or times out. Yet the mount ended up in a different position from where it started (i.e., the initial position I had set in SGPs frame and focus, confirmed by the values in EQMOD’s UI, which it slew to at the start of the sequence). And worse, I missed the target completely.
I need to determine why the mount was so far off when it finished and I don’t know if this is within an acceptable threshold. (Guessing it is a PhD2 problem, but looking for any assistance I can get.)

Astrometry.net’s plate solve reports that my final image is at
Center (RA, Dec): (323.855, 31.303)
Center (RA, hms): 21h 35m 25.230s
Center (Dec, dms): +31° 18’ 11.599"
but I started the session using the coordinates from Telescopius (EQMOD also showed those at the start), which were:
20hr 45’ 38"
30º 42’ 30"
When the session ended, however, EQMOD reported that I was at
20:47:42
+30:57:30
which also doesn’t match the values of the final integrated image that I got from the plate solve.

I don’t know how that drift between the start and end values, nor the location offset in the actual final image could occur, but they definitely impacted the resulting image and must indicate some serious problem.
Log file is linked below - Any suggestions would be appreciated.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/2bqbjj0j34xavw3514khm/Miller-sg_logfile_20241022191832.log?rlkey=9qw6cgxyuvs69xv6lj12apnkt&st=3bt7pb3u&dl=0

I’m not sure off hand. Are those the correct logs? All I see is a single failed attempt at centering at 19:35. It never finishes, but the sequence starts afterward anyhow. In other words, there is no validation that the mount is actually here at the position to which you slewed and very well could be pointed exactly where the Astrometry.Net solve indicates.

Telescope: Slewing to J2000 RA: 20.7605555555556 Dec: 30.7083333333333

Then, a sequence runs for a while with no centering attempts at all and no slewing of any kind reported.

It’s not clear to me (unless there are other logs involved) how you would be certain of the location at which you were pointing when the sequence starts at 19:50.